tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5519292617097628087.post1173567138040892137..comments2024-01-02T16:09:12.886-07:00Comments on Chinleana: Six New Papers from the Forthcoming Volume 'Anatomy, Phylogeny, and Palaeobiology of Early Archosaurs and their Kin.Bill Parkerhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05941940882532354219noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5519292617097628087.post-64124623023068722462013-04-26T09:37:38.159-07:002013-04-26T09:37:38.159-07:00Thanks for the comment. Yes, Momchil Atanassov sho...Thanks for the comment. Yes, Momchil Atanassov should really publish the full description of these specimens. There is an upcoming paper in press by Jeff Martz and colleagues on the faunal assemblage of the Post Quarry that mentions these specimens and some character states possessed by them, but it is outside the scope of that study to provide full descriptions.Bill Parkerhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05941940882532354219noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5519292617097628087.post-35757351792723225192013-04-25T15:10:16.400-07:002013-04-25T15:10:16.400-07:00One more note --- a review of the Triassic pterosa...One more note --- a review of the Triassic pterosaur fossil record has been published in the SP379 volume (Dalla Vechia 2013). If pterosaurs do form a clade with dinosauromorphs to the exclusion of other archosaurs, there would be a gap in the fossil record of pterosaurs from the Scythian to the Ladinian. The archosauromorphs mentioned by Atanassov (2001, 2002) might solve the question of the origins of pterosaurs; the pterosaurian position of the Brazilian taxon Faxinalipterus is tentative and it could conceivably be a close relative of Pterosauria.<br /><br />Fabio M. Dalla Vecchia, 2013. Triassic pterosaurs Geological Society, London, Special Publications, 379, first published on April 25, 2013, doi:10.1144/SP379.14 <br />Davidowhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/06099864739987549261noreply@blogger.com